Consumer Protection / Unconscionable Conduct

High Court rules in Kakavas case

The High Court has today handed down its decision in Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited.

The Court considered the application of the equitable doctrine of unconscionable conduct.

This case arose after Kakavas suffered gambling losses of almost $1.5 billion at Crown over a period of approximately 14 months. Kakavas alleged he suffered from a special disability, in the form of a gambling addiction, and that Crown unconscientiously took advantage of that disability. The trial judge rejected Kakavas’ claim, finding there was no relevant special disability. The Court of Appeal unanimously rejected an appeal by Kakavas. Kakavas sought, and was granted, special leave to appeal to the High Court in December 2012.

Today the High Court – in a unanimous judgment – dismissed Kakavas’ appeal.

View High Court decision.

View my Kakavas case page.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s